Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ||
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST) | :::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ||
− | :::::::::: "Hard no" - after "Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk"... I don't know | + | :::::::::: "Hard no" - after "Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk"... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST) |
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ||
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST) | ::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST) |
Revision as of 16:12, 4 March 2015
I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --STEN (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Even Doom (VG) and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --STEN (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- There have been calls to delete the Doom page from day one. And at least in Doom it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: this picture can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. Which old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --STEN (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for Stalin Subway. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --STEN (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard NO on Wolftenstein 3D. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --STEN (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for Stalin Subway. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: this picture can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. Which old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --STEN (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- There have been calls to delete the Doom page from day one. And at least in Doom it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- Even Doom (VG) and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --STEN (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see here. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)
- I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)