 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Smith & Wesson 44 Hand Ejector Series"
Commando552 (talk | contribs) (→"Smith & Wesson Mk II Hand Ejector" page: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You're right. I forgot that. Fifty lashes with a wet noodle. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 19:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | You're right. I forgot that. Fifty lashes with a wet noodle. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 19:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "Smith & Wesson Mk II Hand Ejector" page == | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is a page called the [[Smith & Wesson Mk II Hand Ejector]], is this actually a different variant made for the British or is it just a 2nd Model chambered in .455? Either way, is there any difference between the two? If not I think the pages should be merged. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:53, 9 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:53, 9 September 2013
Excellent work
- Nice job on the page, Jcordell. I just edited in a blurb in the 2nd model section linking to the M1917 revolver, other than that, this is a very nice page, man. Very good. StanTheMan 16:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I felt like we needed a general overall page to cover the 44 S&W revolver and show how many other Smiths branch off from it. --Jcordell 18:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks JCordell, but IMFDB protocol says that you don't fill the page with blank media sections. If the gun has not appeared in anything yet, you don't list film, television, anime and videogames as sections. You leave it blank. :) MoviePropMaster2008
You're right. I forgot that. Fifty lashes with a wet noodle. --Jcordell 19:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
"Smith & Wesson Mk II Hand Ejector" page
There is a page called the Smith & Wesson Mk II Hand Ejector, is this actually a different variant made for the British or is it just a 2nd Model chambered in .455? Either way, is there any difference between the two? If not I think the pages should be merged. --commando552 (talk) 06:53, 9 September 2013 (EDT)