 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Living Daylights"
Predator20 (talk | contribs) |
(→DS: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Image:Livday-pistol4b.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The CIA agent keeps her S&W 4505 pistol trained on Bond.]] | [[Image:Livday-pistol4b.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The CIA agent keeps her S&W 4505 pistol trained on Bond.]] | ||
It can't be a 4505, it wasn't introduced until '91. --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 06:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | It can't be a 4505, it wasn't introduced until '91. --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 06:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == DS == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't know why someone thinks the snubbie morphs from a SW 36 to a Colt DS. Look at the picture of the "DS." The location of the cylinder release is consistent with it being a SW 36 (below centerline of the cylinder,) rather than the DS, where the release is on the centerline of the cylinder. Did they say something in the commentary? --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 01:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 13 July 2010
The unidentified sniper rifle with blanks that Kara that aims at the defector is a Winchester 70. The black, flush pins are on both sides of the bolt, exactly like my Model 70, as well as the safety is visible when Bond unloads it in the restroom.
Smith & Wesson 4505
The female CIA agent sent by Felix Leiter (John Terry) uses a Smith & Wesson 4505 to convince Bond to go with them. It is a blued handgun based on the 645 design so it is a 4505.
It can't be a 4505, it wasn't introduced until '91. --Predator20 06:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
DS
I don't know why someone thinks the snubbie morphs from a SW 36 to a Colt DS. Look at the picture of the "DS." The location of the cylinder release is consistent with it being a SW 36 (below centerline of the cylinder,) rather than the DS, where the release is on the centerline of the cylinder. Did they say something in the commentary? --funkychinaman 01:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)