Talk:Beretta ARX-160

Additional Images

Beretta ARX-160 Coyote brown with 11.89" barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO

Beretta ARX-160 with M68 Aimpoint red dot sight and 11.89" barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO

Beretta ARX-160 with RIS foregrip and Leupold CQ/T scope - 5.56x45mm NATO

Beretta ARX-100, the civilian version of the ARX-160 - 5.56x45mm NATO

Beretta ARX-160 - .22 Long Rifle

Talk

This looks like one of those horrible G36 / M4 crack-babies videogame companies are always making. Evil Tim 01:08, 22 January 2012 (CST)

I think it looks badass... at least they put some effort into the design that way it is not a 100% AR-15 clone. :) - bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:27, 22 January 2012 (CST)

Same here, I really like the design (even if it might look bulky from some angles). This a badass view lol. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

It's so bulky looking, but not nearly as fat as the F2000 though. Mr. Wolf (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2015 (EDT)

Is not a bulky weapon, and I see it almost every day --Dannyguns (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2016 (EST)

Caliber conversion

I keep hearing that this will be in 6.8 SPC, 5.45x39, and even .300 Blackout (with a .308 version in the works). The only calibers I know the things exists in is 5.56 and 7.62x39. Can anyone confirm where or when the ARX might be available in these other calibers? PhillipC93 (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2015 (EDT)

Yes a 7,62 exist, is called ARX-200, it work like a sniper rifle, and is the one lesslikely to see if you go to Italy, (as terrorism fear, they are soldier everywhere, most with ARXs but someone with a SC-70/90 in some metro stations), and can be adapted 6,8 SPC since is modular design --Dannyguns (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2016 (EST)

Why this gun doesn't appear in media anymore?

Thats weird. Is even adopted by Italian and Argentine Army. Should be super popular now.--Dannyguns (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2018 (EST)

Well it is kind of silly looking. Evil Tim (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2018 (EST)

Is made by Italians. Is normal. :)--Dannyguns (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2018 (EST)

ARX-160 or ARX160?

Searching on Google, IMFDB seems to be one of the few major websites that puts a dash between ARX and 160. Wikipedia uses ARX160, and Beretta USA uses ARX160. Should we rename this to Beretta ARX160? --Wuzh (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2018 (EST)

I've been asking myself the same question. There's another similar issue: IMFDB is also one of the websites that label the MG34, MG42, MG3 as such, whereas in many others there's a space between MG and the corresponding number. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 05:52, 22 November 2018 (EST)

I'm in favor of renaming to ARX160. --HeadAllTheWayUpIt (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2020 (EDT)

Interestingly, the Beretta Defense website currently uses both "ARX160" and "ARX 160" designations. But eh, it appears that "ARX160" is the main one used in descriptions. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)