 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:CocaCola1996"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CocaCola1996 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I know the Irish Republican movement sympathizers quite well. I've seen how much they screwed with the PIRA/CIRA/RIRA articles on Wikipedia. They do the same thing - insist on using the IRA's own terminology ("Volunteers", LOL) in an attempt to legitimize them. Anyway, yes, the IRA are terrorists. And so are the Loyalist scumbags (all of them). At the very least, if you wanted to be neutral, you would use a term like "members", but calling them "Volunteers" is an insult to my intelligence. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 03:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | :I know the Irish Republican movement sympathizers quite well. I've seen how much they screwed with the PIRA/CIRA/RIRA articles on Wikipedia. They do the same thing - insist on using the IRA's own terminology ("Volunteers", LOL) in an attempt to legitimize them. Anyway, yes, the IRA are terrorists. And so are the Loyalist scumbags (all of them). At the very least, if you wanted to be neutral, you would use a term like "members", but calling them "Volunteers" is an insult to my intelligence. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 03:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm Republican, that doesn't mean I'm supporting the Contos or anything, they've done fuck all. | ||
| + | Violence isn't going to achieve anything, so if it makes you feel better you can use the word "members", but "terrorists" is biased. | ||
| + | I didn't even call the Loyalists terrorists. | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 10 July 2009
Do not screw up my page with your bullshit pro-IRA views, got it? I dunno about the other admins, but I take a very dim view of glorifying terrorists. -MT2008 03:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
When did I glorify them? If I wanted to glorify them I'd have called the "freedom-fighters". I didn't, because that's biased. I simply labelled them as what they were. Calling them "terrorists" is biased.
- I know the Irish Republican movement sympathizers quite well. I've seen how much they screwed with the PIRA/CIRA/RIRA articles on Wikipedia. They do the same thing - insist on using the IRA's own terminology ("Volunteers", LOL) in an attempt to legitimize them. Anyway, yes, the IRA are terrorists. And so are the Loyalist scumbags (all of them). At the very least, if you wanted to be neutral, you would use a term like "members", but calling them "Volunteers" is an insult to my intelligence. -MT2008 03:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm Republican, that doesn't mean I'm supporting the Contos or anything, they've done fuck all. Violence isn't going to achieve anything, so if it makes you feel better you can use the word "members", but "terrorists" is biased. I didn't even call the Loyalists terrorists.