|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| + | ==Alternative Poster== |
| − | * At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| + | [[File:Isle of the Dead Poster.jpg|thumb|350px|none|Previous poster with old title ''Isle of the Dead''.]] |
| − | ::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | :::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | :::::::::: "Hard no" - after "Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk"... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| − | ::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
Join our Discord!
