Talk:Legion

Sign your Damned posts!

Anyone who is too lazy to sign their damned posts doesn't deserve to have the post remain on the page. It's fine when you argue back and forth but to put forth zingers without signing it smacks of laziness. I am REMOVING all posts without a signature. MoviePropMaster2008 16:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

This movie looks awesome-S&Wshooter 03:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah it does --AdAstra2009 03:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I found it really funny how I noticed straightaway on the poster that the MP5K was actually an SP89.-protoAuthor

I think the angels have metal wings. Rex095

ALL SCREENCAPS FROM LEGION-REDBAND TRAILER http://www.spike.com/blog/legion-red-band/85055

Storyline I got to say looks original. Haven't seen another film like it. Cant wait for it --k9870

G36's

Arn't these actually just G36 airsoft replicas? I have one at home. You can see the ejecton ports are fake and meerley just cast in plastic. --Captain Snikt 01:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I just saw this.....it was weird. The metal wings were badass though, and some of the movie was just funny. -k9870

This movie isn't weird, it's crap. This movie was, in all fairness, absolutely terrible. There were plot holes big enough to fly a C130 through. The whole thing was just low-grade gun porn (oh man, they showcased guns that I've only seen in every movie with a gun in it. 1911? Check. M16? Check. MP5? Check. Glock? Check. Some sort of shotgun? Check.) stereotypical characters (WASP? Check. Rebellious daughter? Check. Black Man from the streets? Check. Religious Black Man? Check. Hillbillies? Check.), bad acting, and plotholes.--Asmkillr323 06:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Lowl.. Too rite, mate.

The gangsta has a M1911 and all the rednecks have Glocks? The director got his gun stereotypes mixed up

It' because Michael breaks into a gun store and takes lots of guns and when he arrives at Paradise Falls it is said that he gives the guys Glocks and MP5s... I haven't seen the film yet, but I've read the script. Can't wait to see this, inspite of the reviews... ;)

From a religious standpoint... Lord, this movie sucked. First of all, the idea that God stopped forgiving people. Ok, the idea sucks, but I understand if you're not a Christian or familiar with the bible. The idea that God NEEDED something? He is GOD. He needs NOTHING. Even to a nonereligious person, the idea that a supreme, all powerful Being needed something is pretty... argh! And who the beep is this baby, anyway? The Second Coming? Messiah point-two? Why on Earth (forgive the pun) would God decide to exterminate humanity while this whole super baby deal was going on? I don't expect Hollywood to be reverent, I'm not that crazy, but do I expect them to at least get a feel for the God they're portraying. Whew. I'm done.

From a non-crazy standpoint... The idea of a god is ridiculous itself! :) LOL... This is just a brains-roll-out-fun-roll-in -type o' movie that's not to be taken seriously... get over it...

Okay so now lets hear from folks who understand that it's a MOVIE.

As a movie, it's garbage. As entertainment, it's garbage. This movie isn't 'fun' unless you're retarded.

Does it make you feel good to insult people who might enjoy a movie you don't? Spartan198 06:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

When you say garbage, do you mean "Plan 9 garbage", or "Uwe Boll garbage"?--PistolJunkie 22:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

In Uwe Boll's defense, Alone in the Dark had some pretty awesome firefights in it. Spartan198 03:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Legion, on the other hand, had no 'awesome firefights'. It suffered from many action movie cliches, including the lack of need to change mags. The firefights weren't exciting by any stretch; they were as boring as the rest of the movie. Not only that, but the movie was so cliched you could see events coming from miles away. Terrible, TERRIBLE movie. --Asmkillr323 21:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

(oh man, they showcased guns that I've only seen in every movie with a gun in it. 1911? Check. M16? Check. MP5? Check. Glock? Check. Some sort of shotgun? Check.)

Right, but if the director knows how to get the most visual impact from the guns' on-screen appearances, the types don't matter. -MT2008 02:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

This movie was complete trash. I torrented it off the net, and literally about 20 minutes in a had to turn it off. The plot was garbage and shot full of holes, and the action was pathetic at best. Honestly one of the worst movies I've ever seen, I'll out Far Cry ahead of this POS. M14fanboy

Tyrese's 1911 variant

I think his 1911 is a Para-Ordnance Nite-Tac... Is anybody able to confirm that? Warejaws 15:56, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Reading the script again, it says that the gun is WESTERN ARMS .45. But it looks like a Para-Ordnance Nite-Tac to me..

What the script says doesn't matter. Stuff changes between script and filming all the time. What matters is what gun the armorer brought to the set. -MT2008 02:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

The M16

I just watched this movie on Blu Ray, and Michael's M16 is actually an M16A4, not an M16A2. You can see the removable carry handle. -MT2008 02:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Change it dude. I added the caps yesterday and was going with what was already on the page. M16's aren't my strong suit either.--Predator20 03:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Just watched a few scenes again. It looks like the M16s are a mix of A2s and A4s. But the A4 is the one visible in most of your screen captures. -MT2008 04:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

VARIOUS

Is there going to be an attempt to classify each of the firearms in the "various" section, or a listing perhaps? I'll grab my DVD and start running through if anyone agrees. 68.40.79.190 04:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't make a listing or a heading of each one, simply write the names of the firearms you see seperated by commas in the caption for the image. --AdAstra2009 04:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Aside from the Mossberg 500 and Winchester 1200, most of them are guns that have already been documented, anyway. Also, those M16s are clearly the airsoft replicas again. -MT2008 04:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC)