 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ghost"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PistolJunkie (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Works for me. I'll change it. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 21:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | Works for me. I'll change it. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 21:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Already done. I also trimmed down on the excessive links.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 21:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | + | :Already done. I also trimmed down on the excessive links. Makes reading the image descriptions easier. Also, anyone else notice that the PP's safety is on in that first shot?--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 21:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | Great. And thanks. Looks good. I made the changes to the Walther PP/PPK page and the two actor's pages. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 22:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 17 February 2011
PP vs. PPK
I think this is a PP, not a PPK --Taurus96 16:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've been wondering the same thing. I just can't decide.. Hard to get a good screencap of it that gives it some perspective. Waiting for a Walther PP/PPK expert to weigh in. --Jcordell 16:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call myself a PP/PPK "expert", but that's definitely a PP. Notice how the barrel and slide extend well past the frame.--PistolJunkie 21:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Works for me. I'll change it. --Jcordell 21:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Already done. I also trimmed down on the excessive links. Makes reading the image descriptions easier. Also, anyone else notice that the PP's safety is on in that first shot?--PistolJunkie 21:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Great. And thanks. Looks good. I made the changes to the Walther PP/PPK page and the two actor's pages. --Jcordell 22:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)