 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enfield Mk II"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I believe so. I'll have to look it up again, but I know that the ejector was described as being rather flimsy and loading was awkward. Still it just looks neat doesn't it?--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 16:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | I believe so. I'll have to look it up again, but I know that the ejector was described as being rather flimsy and loading was awkward. Still it just looks neat doesn't it?--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 16:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, that's right. The round in the 6 o'clock chamber tended to stick since it was in line with the frame and had to be rotated out. -Nyles | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 5 July 2010
Is this the revolver that had simultaneous ejection but had to be loaded one at a time through the loading gate?
I believe so. I'll have to look it up again, but I know that the ejector was described as being rather flimsy and loading was awkward. Still it just looks neat doesn't it?--Jcordell 16:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, that's right. The round in the 6 o'clock chamber tended to stick since it was in line with the frame and had to be rotated out. -Nyles