Discord-logo.jpg Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:1968 Tunnel Rats"

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 31: Line 31:
 
The supposed Type 84Ss aren't actually 84Ss. They have ribbed reciever covers, open front sights, inline stocks and a lower reciever with a weird angle and odd-looking indentation at the magwell. I they are WASR rifles with Rk 62 or Galil lower recievers (closest match I can find). The supposed AK-47s and AKS-47 appear to be this as well. They are definitely not actual AK-47s [[User:Ramell|Ramell]] 00:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 
The supposed Type 84Ss aren't actually 84Ss. They have ribbed reciever covers, open front sights, inline stocks and a lower reciever with a weird angle and odd-looking indentation at the magwell. I they are WASR rifles with Rk 62 or Galil lower recievers (closest match I can find). The supposed AK-47s and AKS-47 appear to be this as well. They are definitely not actual AK-47s [[User:Ramell|Ramell]] 00:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 
:Since the movie was filmed in South Africa, they are probably R4 or R5 (Galil) rifles that have been modified to resemble AK-47s (as seen in ''[[District 9]]'' or ''[[Chris Ryan's Strike Back]]''). The 5.56 magazine often throws people off when they are trying to identify the weapons. --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 01:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 
:Since the movie was filmed in South Africa, they are probably R4 or R5 (Galil) rifles that have been modified to resemble AK-47s (as seen in ''[[District 9]]'' or ''[[Chris Ryan's Strike Back]]''). The 5.56 magazine often throws people off when they are trying to identify the weapons. --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 01:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 +
::I think you're right. The 'AK's in Tunnel Rats looks just like those in Strike Back and District 9. I completely missed that option when I considered what they could be. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]] 01:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:34, 9 January 2011

Lame uniforms and gear

What makes me ticked off, is that I could have outfitted this entire movie ACCURATELY with what I have in my closet! Arghhhhh. I am also a collector of Vietnam era militaria (US and Enemy forces). MoviePropMaster2008 04:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

This movie is really bad. Casualties of War is better and casualties of war is the movie that paints all american soldiers as psychopaths and rapists that murder for fun. Who the hell could do such a shitty job with the costumes and the weapons used in the movie? Why the fuck did the armourer give Type 84s to Vietcong fighters in a movie that takes place in 1968? Seriously, tell me Moviepropmaster, what was the armourer thinking?Oliveira 19:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Uwe Boll is an idiot.- S&Wshooter

Most likely.Oliveira 17:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


Just rented it

How badass am I, watching movies like this for you? Also, title in America is Tunnel Rats: Hell is for Heroes. -protoAuthor

Who is "you"? Also, Hell is for Heroes sounds like what an late 1940s World War 2 movie would be called. It's an awesome name, i gotta give Boll that.-Oliveira 22:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
I can't admit to watching it because I like bad movies, can I? I mean, I have to have an excuse! -protoAuthor
Also, Hell is for Heroes IS actually a WW2 movie-protoAuthor

Boring as hell

That is probably the only thing I can say about this movie. Just... What was the story? Was there one? I couldn't guess it, I saw it 3 times! -protoAuthor

That's the bad thing about Vietnam War movies. We still didn't have a Band of Brothers or Saving Private Ryan of the Vietnam War. We really need it. None of that Platoon, Casualties of War Anti-war bullshit. I want one like Band of Brothers were they just show US Grunts living through out 1968 in the middle of the Vietnam War without any political shit. Just show me a accurate depiction of the US Involvement of the Vietnam War, Dammit!-Oliveira 17:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

DVD cover

I was at the rentals the other day and I saw this DVD on the racks. I picked it up, noticed the soldier on the cover was holding an M4A1 CARBINE and then my fingers started to burn from holding the case too long so I put it down. Really dumb error there I gotta say. - Gunmaster45

This movie was shot and filmed in SOUTH AFRICA

That's why the American GREEN uniforms look so wrong. They're the same 'green uniforms' that the Cubans and Russians wore in Red Scorpion hahahahaha!. Everything is wrong about this movie MoviePropMaster2008

Errors on page

There's a number of errors, including M16A2s listed as M16A1s with A2 handguards (tip: look at the rear sight). It's not mentioned that all the actual M16A1s in the screencaps have three-prong flash hiders either.

The AKS-47 is called a 'cut-down version' of the AK-47, but they just have a folding stock instead of the fixed stock.

The supposed Type 84Ss aren't actually 84Ss. They have ribbed reciever covers, open front sights, inline stocks and a lower reciever with a weird angle and odd-looking indentation at the magwell. I they are WASR rifles with Rk 62 or Galil lower recievers (closest match I can find). The supposed AK-47s and AKS-47 appear to be this as well. They are definitely not actual AK-47s Ramell 00:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Since the movie was filmed in South Africa, they are probably R4 or R5 (Galil) rifles that have been modified to resemble AK-47s (as seen in District 9 or Chris Ryan's Strike Back). The 5.56 magazine often throws people off when they are trying to identify the weapons. --Markit 01:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
I think you're right. The 'AK's in Tunnel Rats looks just like those in Strike Back and District 9. I completely missed that option when I considered what they could be. Ramell 01:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information