 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:(In The Line of Fire) - Composite Pistol"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) (Removed my inquiry - Just went ahead and kept those listings here, since it's still basically the same weapon) |
(→Why?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Why did it have to be destroyed after the film was made? - [[User: 2wingo]] | Why did it have to be destroyed after the film was made? - [[User: 2wingo]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because, by the way the gun was made, it was practically untrack-/unidentifyable. | ||
| + | So the damage of it reaching "wrong hands" would've been huge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, on the other side, if someone would've used it and it'd have blown up due to wear and tear, the prop-company could've been sued for a lot of money.--[[User:Maxmali|Maxmali]] ([[User talk:Maxmali|talk]]) 11:40, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 15 March 2015
Additional Images
Why?
Why did it have to be destroyed after the film was made? - User: 2wingo
Because, by the way the gun was made, it was practically untrack-/unidentifyable. So the damage of it reaching "wrong hands" would've been huge.
Also, on the other side, if someone would've used it and it'd have blown up due to wear and tear, the prop-company could've been sued for a lot of money.--Maxmali (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2015 (EDT)