Discord-logo.jpg Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Doctor Who (New Series)"

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: There isn't any SCAR in Doctor Who, i think it was a UMP9 i saw instead. How should BBC get ahold of a FN SCAR anyway and in 2005! On the other hand, how should a group of East Timorese Re...)
 
(→‎Gun Law: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There isn't any SCAR in Doctor Who, i think it was a UMP9 i saw instead. How should BBC get ahold of a FN SCAR anyway and in 2005! On the other hand, how should a group of East Timorese Rebels get an F2000. - [[User:Flying Dane|Flying Dane]]
 
There isn't any SCAR in Doctor Who, i think it was a UMP9 i saw instead. How should BBC get ahold of a FN SCAR anyway and in 2005! On the other hand, how should a group of East Timorese Rebels get an F2000. - [[User:Flying Dane|Flying Dane]]
 +
 +
== Gun Law ==
 +
 +
I think the comment about the illegality of full auto weapons for British police is a bit redundant, since UK gun law seems to have gone out the window in the series when you have security guards with full auto G-36s. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:24, 5 May 2009

There isn't any SCAR in Doctor Who, i think it was a UMP9 i saw instead. How should BBC get ahold of a FN SCAR anyway and in 2005! On the other hand, how should a group of East Timorese Rebels get an F2000. - Flying Dane

Gun Law

I think the comment about the illegality of full auto weapons for British police is a bit redundant, since UK gun law seems to have gone out the window in the series when you have security guards with full auto G-36s. The Wierd It 22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


Do Not Sell My Personal Information